NORMATIVITY, EQUAL ACCESS TO BIOTECHNOLOGIES, AND ANTI-PERFECTIONISM. Etica & Politica/Ethics & Politics. 2016;XVIII(3):383-95.
Nudging for Liberals
In this article I argue that anti-perfectionist liberals can accept nudging in certain areas: in particular, they can accept nudges aimed at helping people to discharge their nonenforceable duties, and to secure personal autonomy. I claim that nudging is not disrespectful since it does not involve a comparative negative judgment on people’s ability to pursue their plans, and that the judgments that motivate nudging are compatible with treating citizens as free and equal. I also claim that despite being sometimes manipu- lative, nudging is easy to resist and so it can be employed to pursue legitimate goals.
Political Obligation, and the Site and Scope of Justice’. In: Dainton B, Robinson H, editors. The Bloomsbury Companion to Analytical Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury; 2014. p. 500-22.
The Public Ecology of Freedom of Association. Res Publica. 2014;20(1):85-103.
Disagreement and Legitimacy. Res Publica. 2014;20(1):1-8.
Liberális semlegesség, legitimitás és autonómia. In: Lehetséges: Kis Jánosnak tanítványaitól. Bratislava: Kalligram; 2013. p. 85-108.
Quong's Liberalism without perfection. Vol 30.; 2013. (Journal of Applied Philosophy; vol 30; no 1).
Expressive Interest and the Integrity of Hate Speakers. Politics in Central Europe. 2010;6(3):18-38.
Autonomy, Free Speech and Automatic Behaviour. Res Publica. 2007;13(1):53-75.